Co-ownership of property can take varied authorized varieties, every with distinct implications for possession rights, survivorship, and creditor entry. For instance, one kind may grant every proprietor an equal, undivided curiosity in a property, routinely transferring the deceased proprietor’s share to the surviving proprietor(s) upon loss of life. One other construction may divide possession equally between spouses, treating all belongings acquired through the marriage as collectively owned no matter how the title is held.
Understanding the nuances of those possession buildings is essential for property planning, asset safety, and managing potential disputes. Traditionally, totally different authorized frameworks emerged to deal with evolving societal wants surrounding property possession, notably inside marriage and household buildings. Selecting the proper construction can simplify inheritance, cut back probate complexities, and supply readability on possession rights through the homeowners’ lifetimes.
This text delves into the particular traits of two widespread co-ownership varieties, exploring their respective benefits and drawbacks in varied situations, akin to marriage, enterprise partnerships, and funding ventures. It can additionally study the authorized ramifications of every kind relating to points like debt legal responsibility and the switch of possession pursuits.
1. Possession Type
A crucial distinction between joint tenancy and neighborhood property lies within the basic construction of possession every creates. This construction dictates not solely how the property is held through the homeowners’ lifetimes but additionally how it’s transferred upon loss of life or different triggering occasions. Understanding the nuances of every possession kind is crucial for making knowledgeable choices about property possession and property planning.
-
Proper of Survivorship
Joint tenancy includes a built-in proper of survivorship. Upon the loss of life of 1 joint tenant, their possession curiosity routinely transfers to the surviving joint tenant(s). This avoids probate, simplifying the inheritance course of. Group property, in most jurisdictions, additionally presents a type of survivorship proper, permitting the surviving partner to inherit the decedent’s share. Nevertheless, the particular guidelines governing neighborhood property survivorship range by jurisdiction. This distinction in how survivorship operates can considerably impression property planning methods.
-
Equal Possession Pursuits
Joint tenancy mandates equal possession shares for all joint tenants. Group property, whereas presuming equal possession between spouses, can current complexities relating to separate property introduced into the wedding or items and inheritances acquired through the marriage. These exceptions to the equal possession presumption require cautious consideration.
-
Creation and Termination
Establishing a joint tenancy requires assembly particular authorized necessities, usually involving the “4 unities” of time, title, curiosity, and possession. Conversely, neighborhood property arises routinely upon marriage in neighborhood property states. Terminating a joint tenancy could be achieved by varied actions, together with sale or partition, whereas terminating neighborhood property usually includes authorized procedures akin to divorce or loss of life.
-
Creditor Rights
Collectors can usually attain the curiosity of a joint tenant to fulfill money owed. In distinction, neighborhood property could supply some protections from collectors of 1 partner, relying on the particular circumstances and the state’s legal guidelines. This distinction in creditor entry has substantial implications for asset safety planning.
Deciding on the suitable possession kind joint tenancy or neighborhood property requires cautious consideration of those elements. The chosen construction considerably impacts the rights and tasks of the homeowners, the switch of possession upon loss of life, and the vulnerability of the property to collectors. Consulting with a authorized skilled is advisable to make sure alignment with particular person circumstances and objectives.
2. Survivorship Rights
Survivorship rights signify a cornerstone of each joint tenancy and neighborhood property, albeit with distinct traits. In a joint tenancy, the suitable of survivorship operates routinely. Upon the loss of life of 1 joint tenant, their possession curiosity instantly transfers to the surviving joint tenant(s), bypassing probate. This automated switch can simplify property administration and guarantee a swift transition of possession. Take into account a state of affairs the place two siblings personal a property as joint tenants. If one sibling passes away, the surviving sibling routinely inherits the complete property, no matter any will provisions. Group property, whereas usually providing survivorship advantages, operates in another way relying on the jurisdiction. Some states enable for automated switch of the decedent’s neighborhood property curiosity to the surviving partner, whereas others present choices for the decedent to bequeath their share by a will.
This distinction in survivorship mechanisms has sensible implications for property planning. People wanting full management over the disposition of their property upon loss of life may discover joint tenancy much less versatile than neighborhood property with testamentary rights. Conversely, these prioritizing simplified inheritance and probate avoidance may favor the automated switch inherent in joint tenancy. For instance, a married couple in a neighborhood property state with testamentary rights may select to will their respective shares to their youngsters, guaranteeing a division of belongings totally different from what automated survivorship would supply. Conversely, enterprise companions may go for joint tenancy to make sure enterprise continuity upon the loss of life of a accomplice.
Understanding the nuances of survivorship rights inside joint tenancy and neighborhood property is essential for crafting efficient property plans and managing co-owned property. The selection between these possession varieties depends upon particular person circumstances, property planning objectives, and the particular legal guidelines of the jurisdiction. Failing to contemplate the implications of survivorship rights can result in unintended penalties and potential disputes amongst heirs. Skilled authorized recommendation may also help people navigate these complexities and choose essentially the most acceptable possession construction.
3. Equal Possession
The idea of equal possession performs a central position in each joint tenancy and neighborhood property, but manifests in another way inside every. Whereas joint tenancy mandates equal possession shares for all tenants, neighborhood property operates below a presumption of equal possession between spouses, which could be topic to sure exceptions. Understanding how equal possession capabilities inside every construction is essential for navigating property rights, inheritance, and potential disputes.
-
Joint Tenancy and Equal Shares
Joint tenancy inherently requires equal possession shares for all joint tenants. This equality extends to all points of possession, together with possession, management, and the suitable to any earnings or proceeds from the property. As an example, if three people personal a property as joint tenants, every possesses a one-third undivided curiosity. This construction ensures readability relating to possession proportions and simplifies decision-making associated to the property.
-
Group Property and the Presumption of Equality
Group property operates below the presumption that every one belongings acquired through the marriage are owned equally by each spouses. This is applicable no matter which partner’s identify seems on the title or who earned the earnings used to accumulate the asset. Nevertheless, separate property, akin to belongings owned earlier than the wedding or acquired as items or inheritance through the marriage, usually stays separate. For instance, an inheritance acquired by one partner through the marriage usually stays that partner’s separate property, not topic to the neighborhood property presumption.
-
Exceptions to Equal Possession in Group Property
Whereas neighborhood property presumes equal possession, particular conditions can create exceptions. Separate property, as talked about above, is one such exception. Moreover, some jurisdictions acknowledge quasi-community property, which treats property acquired by one partner whereas domiciled in a non-community property state as neighborhood property upon transferring to a neighborhood property state. Understanding these exceptions is crucial for correct asset division in instances of divorce or loss of life.
-
Implications for Division of Property
The equal possession precept inherent in joint tenancy simplifies property division upon the loss of life of a joint tenant because of the proper of survivorship. In neighborhood property, equal division usually happens upon divorce or loss of life, topic to the principles relating to separate property. Nevertheless, complexities can come up when separate and neighborhood property turn out to be commingled, requiring cautious tracing of belongings and doubtlessly resulting in disputes.
Equal possession, whereas a central facet of each joint tenancy and neighborhood property, operates in another way inside every construction. Recognizing these variations, notably relating to the exceptions and implications associated to neighborhood property, is paramount for efficient property planning and property administration. The construction chosen considerably impacts how property is managed, transferred, and divided upon loss of life or divorce.
4. Marriage Requirement
A key distinction between joint tenancy and neighborhood property lies within the marriage requirement. Joint tenancy is accessible to any two or extra people, no matter marital standing. Pals, enterprise companions, or members of the family can set up joint tenancy. Conversely, neighborhood property is inherently linked to marriage. Solely married {couples} can maintain property as neighborhood property. This basic distinction considerably impacts the applicability of every possession kind and displays differing authorized and social contexts. As an example, two single enterprise companions selecting to co-own property would go for joint tenancy, as neighborhood property is just not out there to them.
The wedding requirement for neighborhood property stems from the authorized precept of treating spouses as a single financial unit. Property acquired through the marriage, no matter which partner earned the earnings or whose identify seems on the title, are thought of collectively owned. This precept goals to supply financial equality and safety inside the marriage. Nevertheless, this marital hyperlink limits the pliability of neighborhood property as a co-ownership possibility. For instance, a married couple may maintain their major residence as neighborhood property, whereas an single couple co-owning an funding property would make the most of joint tenancy. The differing implications for property planning and asset division in instances of divorce or loss of life additional underscore the significance of understanding the wedding requirement distinction.
In abstract, the wedding requirement is a crucial issue distinguishing joint tenancy and neighborhood property. Joint tenancy presents a versatile co-ownership construction out there to any people, whereas neighborhood property particularly addresses the authorized and financial realities of marriage. Recognizing this distinction is crucial for choosing essentially the most acceptable co-ownership kind and navigating the authorized implications related to every. This understanding permits people to tailor their property possession technique to their particular circumstances, whether or not they’re married or single, and to align with their long-term monetary and property planning objectives.
5. Creditor Safety
Creditor entry to belongings held as joint tenancy or neighborhood property represents a crucial consideration in asset safety planning. The authorized buildings governing these possession varieties supply various ranges of safety from collectors, impacting debt assortment methods and the potential penalties of monetary liabilities. Understanding these nuances is essential for safeguarding belongings and navigating potential monetary vulnerabilities.
-
Joint Tenancy and Creditor Vulnerability
In joint tenancy, every tenant’s curiosity is mostly topic to creditor claims. A creditor can usually connect a lien to a joint tenant’s share of the property, doubtlessly resulting in a compelled sale to fulfill the debt. This vulnerability underscores the potential dangers related to joint tenancy, notably in conditions involving enterprise ventures or private liabilities. For instance, if one joint tenant incurs vital debt, the creditor might power the sale of the complete property, impacting the opposite joint tenant(s).
-
Group Property and Various Safety Ranges
Group property presents extra complicated creditor safety situations. Typically, neighborhood property is topic to money owed incurred by both partner through the marriage. Nevertheless, separate property, akin to belongings owned earlier than the wedding or acquired as items or inheritance, could also be protected against collectors of the opposite partner. The precise guidelines governing creditor entry to neighborhood property range by jurisdiction, additional complicating the panorama. In some states, collectors can attain solely the debtor partner’s share of neighborhood property, whereas in others, the complete neighborhood property could also be susceptible. This variability necessitates cautious consideration of state-specific laws.
-
Homestead Exemptions and Creditor Safety
Homestead exemptions, out there in lots of jurisdictions, supply an extra layer of creditor safety for sure properties designated as the first residence. These exemptions can defend a portion of the house’s fairness from creditor claims, no matter whether or not the property is held as joint tenancy or neighborhood property. The precise quantity of the exemption varies by state. Homestead exemptions present a helpful safeguard in opposition to creditor actions, notably in instances of unexpected monetary hardship.
-
Influence of Loss of life on Creditor Rights
Upon the loss of life of a joint tenant, the suitable of survivorship transfers the deceased tenant’s curiosity to the surviving tenant(s), successfully extinguishing the deceased tenant’s share and any related creditor claims in opposition to it. In neighborhood property, the surviving partner usually inherits the deceased partner’s share. Nevertheless, money owed incurred by the deceased partner should still be recoverable from the deceased partner’s property, doubtlessly impacting the inherited neighborhood property. Understanding these post-death implications is essential for complete property planning.
Creditor safety issues play a major position in choosing between joint tenancy and neighborhood property. Whereas joint tenancy presents simplicity by way of possession switch, it exposes every tenant to the potential liabilities of the opposite joint tenant(s). Group property, with its various ranges of safety and the excellence between separate and neighborhood property, presents a extra nuanced panorama. Cautious analysis of particular person monetary circumstances, state-specific legal guidelines, and property planning objectives is crucial for making knowledgeable choices relating to asset safety and co-ownership buildings. Consulting with authorized and monetary professionals is advisable to navigate these complexities successfully.
6. Transferability Restrictions
Transferability restrictions signify a major level of divergence between joint tenancy and neighborhood property. These restrictions, or lack thereof, impression an proprietor’s skill to promote, reward, or in any other case switch their possession curiosity. Understanding these limitations is essential for efficient property planning and property administration. Joint tenancy presents inherent restrictions on transferability because of the proper of survivorship. A joint tenant can’t bequeath their curiosity in a will; upon loss of life, possession routinely transfers to the surviving joint tenant(s). Moreover, transferring possession throughout life requires severing the joint tenancy, typically changing it to a tenancy in widespread. This motion requires settlement amongst all joint tenants and might have vital authorized and monetary implications. For instance, one joint tenant trying to promote their share with out the consent of the opposite joint tenants could face authorized challenges.
Group property presents a special set of transferability restrictions. Typically, neither partner can unilaterally switch their share of neighborhood property with out the opposite partner’s consent. This restriction goals to guard each spouses’ pursuits in collectively acquired belongings. Nevertheless, particular laws range by jurisdiction, with some states permitting for exceptions below sure circumstances. As an example, one partner may be capable to switch their curiosity in neighborhood property as a present with the opposite partner’s written consent. The implications for property planning are vital, because the switch restrictions can restrict a person’s management over the disposition of their belongings. Take into account a state of affairs the place one partner needs to reward their share of neighborhood property to a baby from a earlier marriage. The opposite partner’s consent is usually required for such a switch. Understanding these nuances is crucial for navigating property possession inside a wedding and guaranteeing alignment with property planning objectives.
In abstract, transferability restrictions perform in another way inside joint tenancy and neighborhood property. Joint tenancy’s proper of survivorship inherently limits testamentary disposition, whereas neighborhood property typically requires spousal consent for inter vivos transfers. These variations underscore the significance of choosing the suitable possession construction based mostly on particular person circumstances, property planning aims, and relevant state legal guidelines. Navigating these restrictions successfully requires cautious consideration of the authorized implications and potential challenges related to every possession kind. Failing to grasp these nuances can result in unintended penalties and potential disputes relating to property possession and inheritance.
7. Relevant States
The authorized frameworks governing joint tenancy and neighborhood property differ considerably based mostly on state legislation. Joint tenancy is acknowledged in most states, whereas neighborhood property is restricted to a smaller subset. This geographic distinction underscores the significance of understanding the relevant state legal guidelines when establishing or managing co-owned property. Selecting the suitable possession construction necessitates cautious consideration of the authorized panorama inside the related jurisdiction. Failing to take action can result in unintended penalties and potential authorized challenges.
-
Group Property States
Group property exists in Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. These states function below the precept that belongings acquired throughout marriage are owned equally by each spouses. Alaska additionally permits for neighborhood property possession by an opt-in course of. For instance, a married couple residing in California buying a house throughout their marriage would usually maintain the property as neighborhood property. This has vital implications for asset division in instances of divorce or loss of life.
-
Joint Tenancy Prevalence
Joint tenancy, whereas acknowledged in most states, operates in another way than neighborhood property. It doesn’t require marriage and permits for 2 or extra people to co-own property with the suitable of survivorship. As an example, two associates buying a trip house collectively in Maine might go for joint tenancy. Upon the loss of life of 1 good friend, the opposite would routinely inherit the deceased good friend’s share.
-
State-Particular Variations in Joint Tenancy
Whereas the essential ideas of joint tenancy are usually constant throughout states, variations exist relating to particular points, akin to the necessities for creating a sound joint tenancy and the procedures for severing it. These nuances underscore the significance of consulting with authorized professionals conversant in the particular legal guidelines of the related jurisdiction. For instance, the required language in a deed to ascertain joint tenancy may differ between states. Failure to stick to those particular necessities can result in unintended authorized penalties.
-
Interstate Implications
Complexities come up when people residing in numerous states co-own property or when people transfer from a neighborhood property state to a non-community property state or vice-versa. These interstate situations typically set off conflicts of legal guidelines, requiring cautious consideration of which state’s legal guidelines govern the property possession and potential authorized disputes. For instance, a pair transferring from California (a neighborhood property state) to Oregon (a non-community property state) should deal with the implications for his or her neighborhood property belongings. Authorized recommendation is essential for navigating these interstate complexities.
The relevant state legal guidelines considerably impression the selection between joint tenancy and neighborhood property, in addition to the authorized implications related to every possession kind. Understanding the geographic limitations of neighborhood property and the state-specific variations in joint tenancy is crucial for efficient property possession and property planning. The correct construction can range dramatically relying on the jurisdiction, highlighting the necessity for tailor-made authorized recommendation to navigate the complexities of co-ownership throughout totally different authorized landscapes.
8. Severability
Severability, inside the context of co-ownership, refers back to the skill of a person proprietor to terminate their co-ownership curiosity with out affecting the possession construction of the remaining co-owners. This idea holds vital implications when evaluating joint tenancy and neighborhood property, as the convenience and penalties of severability differ considerably between these two types of possession. In joint tenancy, severing one’s curiosity is mostly simple. A joint tenant can unilaterally sever the joint tenancy by conveying their curiosity to a different celebration. This motion transforms the joint tenancy right into a tenancy in widespread, with the brand new proprietor holding their share as a tenant in widespread with the remaining unique joint tenants. This new association eliminates the suitable of survivorship for the severed curiosity. As an example, if three siblings personal a property as joint tenants and one sibling sells their share to a good friend, the good friend turns into a tenant in widespread with the remaining two siblings. The best of survivorship continues to use between the 2 remaining siblings, however the associates share might be topic to their will or intestate succession legal guidelines.
Group property, conversely, presents better challenges relating to severability. Given the inherent hyperlink to marriage and the presumption of equal possession, severing one partner’s curiosity usually requires mutual settlement or authorized motion, akin to divorce or authorized separation. Unilateral severance is mostly not permitted. This restriction protects each spouses’ pursuits in collectively acquired belongings. For instance, a partner trying to promote their share of neighborhood property with out the opposite partner’s consent would seemingly face authorized obstacles. Exceptions may exist in particular circumstances, akin to court-ordered divisions of property or agreements between spouses. Nevertheless, the basic precept stays that severing neighborhood property is extra complicated and restrictive than severing joint tenancy.
Understanding the implications of severability is essential for choosing the suitable co-ownership construction. Joint tenancy presents better flexibility for particular person homeowners to exit the association, whereas neighborhood property prioritizes the soundness and shared possession inherent in marriage. The potential penalties of severability, together with the impression on survivorship rights and the complexity of authorized procedures, should be rigorously thought of in mild of particular person circumstances and long-term objectives. These issues are paramount for efficient property planning and property administration. A radical understanding of severability ensures readability relating to possession rights, switch choices, and the potential authorized implications related to every co-ownership construction.
Steadily Requested Questions
This part addresses widespread queries relating to the distinctions between joint tenancy and neighborhood property. Readability on these steadily requested questions is crucial for knowledgeable decision-making relating to property possession and property planning.
Query 1: Can people in a home partnership maintain property as neighborhood property?
Group property is mostly restricted to legally married {couples}. Home partnerships, whereas providing sure authorized recognitions, usually don’t qualify for neighborhood property possession. Particular state legal guidelines relating to home partnerships and property possession needs to be consulted.
Query 2: How does divorce impression property held as joint tenants?
Divorce doesn’t routinely sever joint tenancy. Divorcing events holding property as joint tenants should take particular authorized motion to partition or promote the property, or in any other case agree on a division of possession. A divorce decree may order the sale of the property and division of proceeds, or one celebration may purchase out the opposite celebration’s curiosity.
Query 3: Can a will override the suitable of survivorship in joint tenancy?
No, a will can’t override the suitable of survivorship inherent in joint tenancy. Upon the loss of life of a joint tenant, their curiosity routinely transfers to the surviving joint tenant(s), no matter any provisions in a will. The need would solely govern the disposition of any individually owned property.
Query 4: Is it doable to transform neighborhood property to joint tenancy?
Changing neighborhood property to joint tenancy requires a proper authorized settlement between the spouses. This settlement should adhere to the particular authorized necessities for establishing joint tenancy within the related jurisdiction. This conversion could have vital tax and property planning implications.
Query 5: What are the potential tax implications of holding property as neighborhood property versus joint tenancy?
Each neighborhood property and joint tenancy supply potential tax advantages, notably relating to property taxes. In neighborhood property states, upon the loss of life of 1 partner, solely half of the neighborhood property is usually included within the deceased partner’s property for federal property tax functions. Joint tenancy presents an analogous profit by the suitable of survivorship. Nevertheless, particular tax implications range relying on federal and state legal guidelines, and consulting with a tax advisor is advisable.
Query 6: How can one decide essentially the most acceptable type of co-ownership for his or her particular state of affairs?
Selecting between joint tenancy and neighborhood property requires cautious consideration of particular person circumstances, monetary objectives, and property planning aims. Components akin to marital standing, creditor considerations, and desired management over asset switch play a vital position. Consulting with authorized and monetary professionals is crucial for customized steering.
Understanding the nuances of each joint tenancy and neighborhood property is essential for efficient property possession and property planning. Cautious consideration of those FAQs, together with skilled authorized recommendation, empowers people to make knowledgeable choices aligned with their particular wants.
This text will additional delve into particular situations and case research, offering sensible examples of how these co-ownership buildings perform in real-world conditions.
Sensible Suggestions for Navigating Co-Possession
Deciding on the suitable co-ownership construction requires cautious consideration of particular person circumstances, monetary objectives, and long-term property planning aims. The next ideas supply steering for navigating the complexities of joint tenancy and neighborhood property.
Tip 1: Seek the advice of with Authorized Counsel: Navigating the intricacies of property legislation requires knowledgeable steering. Authorized counsel can present tailor-made recommendation based mostly on particular circumstances, guaranteeing compliance with relevant state legal guidelines and alignment with property planning aims. That is notably essential given the state-specific nature of neighborhood property and variations in joint tenancy legal guidelines.
Tip 2: Outline Possession Aims: Readability relating to possession objectives is paramount. Issues embody survivorship preferences, creditor safety wants, and the specified degree of management over asset switch. Clearly outlined aims inform the choice of essentially the most acceptable co-ownership construction. For instance, enterprise companions prioritizing enterprise continuity may favor joint tenancy, whereas married {couples} targeted on asset safety may think about neighborhood property.
Tip 3: Perceive Property Planning Implications: Co-ownership buildings considerably impression property planning. Take into account how every construction interacts with present wills, trusts, and different property planning paperwork. Skilled steering can guarantee alignment between co-ownership decisions and total property planning methods. As an example, people wishing to bequeath their property curiosity to particular heirs may discover joint tenancy much less appropriate resulting from its inherent proper of survivorship.
Tip 4: Take into account Tax Implications: Each joint tenancy and neighborhood property supply potential tax benefits, however the particular implications range based mostly on particular person circumstances and relevant tax legal guidelines. Consulting with a tax advisor may also help optimize tax methods inside the chosen co-ownership construction.
Tip 5: Doc Possession Agreements Clearly: Whatever the chosen co-ownership construction, clear documentation is crucial. Formal agreements outlining possession rights, tasks, and procedures for switch or severance can forestall future disputes. For joint tenancy, this may contain a meticulously drafted deed; for neighborhood property, a prenuptial or postnuptial settlement is likely to be helpful.
Tip 6: Overview and Replace Possession Buildings Periodically: Life modifications, akin to marriage, divorce, or modifications in monetary circumstances, could necessitate reviewing and doubtlessly updating co-ownership buildings. Common assessment ensures ongoing alignment with evolving wants and authorized necessities.
Tip 7: Perceive the Implications of Severability: Take into account the implications of severing the co-ownership association. Joint tenancy presents better ease of severance, whereas neighborhood property usually requires mutual settlement or authorized motion. This distinction has vital implications for particular person management and adaptability.
Cautious consideration of the following tips empowers knowledgeable decision-making relating to co-ownership buildings. Aligning the chosen construction with particular person circumstances, monetary objectives, and property planning aims is paramount for profitable property administration and inheritance planning.
The next conclusion summarizes the important thing distinctions between joint tenancy and neighborhood property and reinforces the significance of searching for skilled steering.
Joint Tenants vs Group Property
Navigating the panorama of co-ownership requires a nuanced understanding of the distinct authorized and sensible implications related to joint tenancy and neighborhood property. This exploration has highlighted key differentiators, together with the suitable of survivorship, creditor entry, transferability restrictions, and the basic marriage requirement inherent in neighborhood property. Every construction presents distinctive benefits and drawbacks, underscoring the necessity for cautious consideration based mostly on particular person circumstances, monetary objectives, and property planning aims. The geographic limitations of neighborhood property and the variations in joint tenancy legal guidelines throughout jurisdictions additional emphasize the complexity of this space of legislation.
The selection between joint tenants and neighborhood property considerably impacts property possession rights, inheritance outcomes, and potential vulnerabilities to creditor claims. Given the profound penalties related to these co-ownership buildings, searching for skilled authorized and monetary recommendation is paramount. A radical understanding of those distinct possession varieties empowers knowledgeable decision-making, guaranteeing alignment with long-term objectives and safeguarding particular person pursuits. This proactive strategy is essential for efficient property administration, property preservation, and the mitigation of potential future disputes.
